Mauritian Law : No more than 2 dogs!

Posted on March 29th, 2008 by Yashvin

Hello everyone…

I was astonished by wat i read this morning in the Le Defi Plus newspaper…


title.jpg

Oh, no, not exactly by this title, but rather, one sentence from that particular article, as shown below…

extract.jpg

According to an inspector of the MSPCA, an owner can have only 2 dogs, else, he is considered as a dog breeder, thus has to possess a permit issued by that organisation.

Well, now look in your neighborhood…

How many of you have more than 2 dogs? do you have a dog breeder permit? lol!

Take a minute to think about that more deeper, if an owner can have only 2 dogs, then, if there are 5 persons in that family, living under 1 roof, that makes 5×2=10dogs, it that right?

wanted.jpg
btw, this is Pam, our 2nd dog at home…
Oh yes, then i think that u can have more than 2 dogs in your yard, you are safe from the law side :D

Wait wait wait, another thing…

Is there any law for other animals? Birds? Cats?

Thats so stupid!

Its high time that those laws are revised, as well as all of the institutions, which are completely outdated with their laws and principles established centuries ago… just like those famous “100ml of rainfall” which caused the death of ppl among our population.

btw, yesterday i bought an ipod shuffle 1GB… nice thing and so SMALL!


ipod1.jpg

  1. 16 Responses to “Mauritian Law : No more than 2 dogs!”

  2. MyAvatars 0.2

    morinn

    Comment on March 29th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    lol! i am a dog breeder! :P mo p ale cachiete mo bne toutou moi! hihi. btw your pam looks a little like my kushie. :D

  3. MyAvatars 0.2

    Deepa

    Comment on March 29th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    Eyyyy mo un dog breeder as mo ena doggies..
    sa law la bien banal selmem,avan mo ti ena 6 doggies parla b kumien permission nu ti bzn pran.i sink avan mo toutou give birth to new ones,mo bzn fer li sign un document ki li pu donne birth according to z law:p:p:p

  4. MyAvatars 0.2

    Deepa

    Comment on March 29th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    Btw ipod seyr net,to pass mw li,mo cpv met sa kuma earning;)

    Don Pam lor bazz la.li pa pu cpv dir ki zot fer 2 liyieux nw,li aussi so pic lor net kuma piff..

  5. MyAvatars 0.2

    carrotmadman6

    Comment on March 29th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    Dan mo chemin (d’ailleurs dans tout chemins Triolet li pareil! :P), zis moi ki pena chiens!

    Chinese One-Child policy should be applied here… One-Animal Policy! LOL :D

    & all animals should be castrated! :P

    Shuffle sucks… iPod Touch FTW!!! :o

  6. MyAvatars 0.2

    carrotmadman6

    Comment on March 29th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    Where my comments!?!?! :s

    Phew… i guess the “watchdog” spammed it! :P

  7. MyAvatars 0.2

    Yashvin

    Comment on March 29th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    to carrotmadman:
    lol, wai, askimet ti manze to comments lol!
    sorry for that…
    Ipod touch :P lol, price la si “touch” meme ^)

    to deepa:
    dan some time pu ouvert ‘refuge chiens’ kot toi…

    to morinn:
    lol, so peut etre pam n kushie fami :P (&)

  8. MyAvatars 0.2

    Bad_boy

    Comment on March 29th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    btw, yesterday i bought an ipod shuffle 1GB… nice thing and so SMALL!>>>ahummm.lol pam

  9. MyAvatars 0.2

    tushal

    Comment on March 29th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    LMAO…
    mwa..mo ena 4 dogs..:p
    but anyway..si strt aplik sa law la..ena mo croire 75% fami mauricien pou fall dan category breaking that rule

  10. MyAvatars 0.2

    vinay

    Comment on March 30th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    No kidding, I got fined by the MSPCA for breeding without a permit…… i had 15986365742354893523 Cockroaches in my room only. Now, multiplied by five family members….. ;-):p

  11. MyAvatars 0.2

    vicks

    Comment on March 30th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    bon.. since pe coz lichien mem.. personne pena ene ti doberman pou give away freely :$

    @yashvin
    glaC mem.. to pas enkor donne moi bday gift :) ene ipod pas ti pou mal :p

  12. MyAvatars 0.2

    c

    Comment on March 31st, 2008.

    Gravatar

    guess what!! My neighbour suffered the same fate. NeighbourB complained abt neighbourA’s dogs to the police of environment. His dogs barked a lot at night n prevented him from sleeping. The police came next morning and said the same stuff as mentioned in yr blog. Coincidentally of the 3 dogs he bred, there was one female, and none were MSPCA registered. After having enquired at the MSPCA, neighbourA registered his dogs and bought a collar for each of them. An officer at the MSPCA told him de nepli pran tracas ec casse la tete ni ar voisin ni ar police environment.

  13. MyAvatars 0.2

    amishi

    Comment on April 1st, 2008.

    Gravatar

    not more than 2 dogs per owner!! mo demand mw kombien dimoune pren kont sa law la… or even kombien dimune kone sa.

    btw,mw mo ena ipod nano 8GB!!!! yuyu!!! hehe

  14. MyAvatars 0.2

    Yashvin

    Comment on April 1st, 2008.

    Gravatar

    to vicks:
    dommage, to bd fini passer, attane next yr aster(y)

    to amishi :
    grrrr, kifer tone dire to ena nano 8gb:$

  15. MyAvatars 0.2

    Bernardo

    Comment on April 5th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    Hello Yashvin,

    Nearly every country have “No of dogs restrictions” laws.. Usually the law allows 2 or 3 dogs max if you don’t have a breeder’s licence..

    A quick search on Google(tm) will reveal that.. The following paragraphs are just a illustration why such laws USUALLY exists..

    “The goal of this law (USUALLY) is to cut down on the problems that dogs cause in urban areas.”
    Courts upholding such an ordinance usually put it this way, “too many dogs in too small a space may produce noise, odor and other conditions adverse to the best interests of the community as a whole”

    “Court challenges to such ordinances almost always fail, but there are exceptions”

    (http://doglaw.hugpug.com/doglaw_008.html)

    Although you and some (good) people take much care of their dogs, give them love, feed them, keep them in a suitably living space, there are many cases in mauritius where people have 2+ dogs that they don’t even care about and leave them to (1) bark out loud (bol) (2) wander around dangerously … (this may cause human life or animal life loss) These dogs are not given any love or attention…
    Thus “No of dogs per person” laws TRY to limit that from happening..

    However (again) a quick search on google will reveal that “no of dogs per person” are usually not very much enforced because if you keep your (2+) dogs from causing nuissance such as barking out loud (bol) all night long or causing pollution (smell etc..) around… your neighbours usually tolerate them…

    There are actually different variants of this law for other types of animal (cats, tortoise, etc…).. but in general… SPA (or MSPCA in mauritius) intervene only where animals cause nuissance to other humans..

    An article on wikipedia also says that some “no of dogs per person” laws try also to limit the (possible) spread of diseases (Rabies for example)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Dog_policy

    I personally believe that we should be tolerant towards each other… we should prevent our pets from causing nuissance to our fellow humans. On the other hand we should leave our fellow neighbours live freely and happily with his/her (N) number of animals so long they are well treated, well taken care of and causes no trouble around..

    PS: Courts usually interprete “no of animals per person” as “no of animals per family)

    That was my 50 cents..
    Peace out ppl

  16. MyAvatars 0.2

    Yashvin

    Comment on April 5th, 2008.

    Gravatar

    to my colleague and friend Bernard:

    8-)No Comments 8-)

    bisin dire twa arrete lire mo blog aster, sak koup to casse nissa lol

    (y)

  17. MyAvatars 0.2

    miss cellie

    Comment on April 23rd, 2008.

    Gravatar

    mw g 6 chien e cet lois….bein elle peut aller voir ailleurs!!! ke d coneris!! si sa kontinu, bientot on aura besoin de permit pour bouffer…!!!!:s (n)

Post a Comment

:) :( :'( 8-) :^) :o |-) :| :p *-) ;) :s :$ (y) (n) more »